Why Romania is a nation of homeowners, while Switzerland – a nation of tenants
- 97Shares
97% of Romanians and 90% of Lithuanians live in their own apartments or houses, while more than half of the Swiss and Germans rent their residential properties. Here’s why.
For many Europeans buying a home is the ultimate goal, along with a graduation from the university and family creation. For them homeownership equals stability and investment, thus people seek to buy a housing unit as early as possible.
On average, Europeans prefer to own their home. 7 out of every 10 Europeans live in owner-occupied dwellings, according to the latest Eurostat data. However, these numbers highly vary from country to country.
Nine out of ten Geneva’s residents are tenants
The highest homeownership rate in Europe is in Romania where 96.8% of the population own their residential properties. Lithuania and Croatia come in second and third with around 90% homeownership rate, followed by Slovakia (89.5%) and Hungary (85.3%).
By contrast, half of Germans and more than half of the Swiss are tenants. In Germany, less than 52% of the population own their housing units. Whereas in Switzerland only 43% of properties are occupied by their owners, and it is the lowest homeownership rate in Europe.
Actually, in several Swiss cities the vast majority of households are rentals. According to Swiss federal statistical office report published in March, in Geneva, around 91% of residents were tenants, in Lausanne 90%, in Zurich 89%.
By comparison, around 64% of Americans own a home, according to the Census Bureau.
So why a rent is a norm in one European country, yet a short-term solution in the other? From historical and financial issues to tenants’ rights protection, there is a whole host of reasons why one country is called a nation of homeowners, while the other – a nation of tenants.
A massive privatization in Eastern Europe in 1990s
The main reason why Romania, Lithuania, Hungary and other countries that were under the communist regime, have the highest homeownership shares in Europe goes back to 1990s. After the collapse of the Soviet Union, the massive privatization of state-owned housing took place in these Central and Eastern European countries.
According to the paper “Housing privatization in Romania. An Anti‐commons tragedy?” by Robert Buckley and Ashna Mathema, Romania has experienced one of the most rapid shifts in housing property rights that has ever occurred.
“As a result of mass privatization in the 1990s, housing ownership in Romania’s cities changed from being one of the most strictly managed to one in which individual ownership is the highest in the world,” state the authors in the publication.
Romania: tenants don’t have many rights
However, after 3 decades, a new generation still strives to own a home. Romanian Ana (who didn’t want her real name to be published), 33, and her husband bought a 3 bedroom apartment in Bucharest, the capital of Romania, 3 years ago.
Before buying her own property, Ana had been renting an apartment for 3 years. However, after the last landlord refused to fix some problems that had appeared in an apartment, the couple decided to get their own home.
“In 2015 I was 30 years old. I had two cats, so it was extremely hard to find a good apartment for renting,” explained Ana to Business Fondue.
Ana names various reasons why Romanians are still so much into owning a property. For a start, the tenants feel unprotected as the majority don’t have a legal contract. According to Ana, most of rental contracts are not officially declared to National agency for fiscal administration in order to avoid taxes.
”So you can be kicked out of the apartment the next day. Or your landlord could come to your home in your absence. Unfortunately, this had happened to us. Also, a landlord can increase a rent with no prior warning,” said Ana.
However, Ana believes that renting an apartment in major Romanian cities is actually more common than the Eurostat statistics suggest. She assumes that since lots of contracts are not declared to fiscal administration, they might not appear in any official statistics.
Mortgage payments are lower than monthly rent
Another issue that can’t be overlooked: the financial aspect. According to Ana, monthly mortgage costs are the same as monthly rental payments.
On top of that, banks in Romania offer a special credit called “First house” that is guaranteed by the state. Furthermore, it requires only a 5% down payment, while a regular mortgage loan requires 15%-25% down payment.
Diana Lukoseviciene, 35, from Lithuania – another nation of homeowners – also points to the financial issue.
Recently she, her husband and an infant daughter have moved to a bigger apartment they had bought. Before the family lived in a small apartment Diana had inherited from her aunt.
“In our case, monthly mortgage payments are lower than monthly rent for the similar apartment. Besides, you can furnish the apartment as you like, you don’t need to worry that your child will draw on the walls, or that a landlord might increase a rent or sell an apartment. From this point of view, you feel freer when you own an apartment,” said Diana.
Lithuania: people don’t feel at home in a rented apartment
Indeed, many Lithuanians see a lot of benefits of homeownership.
“In my opinion, this goes all the way back to the old days. For Lithuanians, it is important to have their own apartment or house which they could leave to their children or grandchildren; where they could feel safe and truly at home. Besides, when you own a property, you don’t feel that you are wasting your money on a rent,” explained Diana.
Why Switzerland and Germany are tenant nations
In Romania or Lithuania where people consider the rent as a short-term solution, the rental housing market is not so well developed or regulated.
Usually, the supply of a good quality rental property is short, and it is extremely hard to find a long-term rental property. Dwellings are mainly rented by private landlords, however, a significant share of rental properties are not declared officially. Finally, the rental market is poorly regulated so tenants don’t have any rights against a rent increase or eviction.
By contrast, in countries like Switzerland or Germany, the rental market is well developed. It is possible to rent for long-term periods, such as 10 years or more.
What is more important, laws protect tenants from eviction and sudden or high rent increase. There are many more benefits for tenants in these countries. For example, you can check in a city’s websites whether your rent is fair.
On the other hand, a well developed rental market is not the main reason why half of Germans or Swiss end up as long-term tenants. The dream of owning a home is shared by millions around the Europe, but the fact is that high property taxes, steep mortgage requirements and other financial obligations for property owners prevent many Germans and the Swiss from buying a home.
- 97Shares
Saying that in ROmania ” 96.8% of the population own their residential properties. ” is far, far from reality. I don’t know what studies were consulted in order to come to this conclusion but this is definitely not true.. You see, 97% of Romanians do not own a home It is true that out of all the inhabitants, the large majority owns their home, and less of them rent, but it’s not like 98 out of every 100 romanians own a house. Also, with the adoption of the new civil code in ROmania, the tenants have far more rights than they used to. Thei rights are quite comparable to the european mean.
In both matters, you ought to do your research again, for real this time.
Figures are published by Eurostat, European Union statistics agency. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/submitViewTableAction.do
However, in the article a homeowner from Romania explains why real figures might differ from official statistics: “Ana believes that renting an apartment in major Romanian cities is actually more common than the Eurostat statistics suggest. She assumes that since lots of contracts are not declared to fiscal administration, they might not appear in any official statistics.”
That’s true. Romanian people like to own a house. They do not feel secure rentung; and being a family orientit nation, they like to live to their children and grandchildren a property.
For this reason the statistic may be accurate 😑
I needed to thank you for this good read!! I certainly enjoyed every little bit of it. I’ve got you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post gaadadccgefgddac
Thank you, your feedback is highly appreciated!
On one hand there is Eurostat statistics which also indicate that the majority of the homes in Romania are detached houses. not apartments. On the other there is Ana’s opinion which is one in 20 million yet gets more weight than Eurostat. The number of dwellings in Romania is 8,976,794 for a population of 19.4 million which is 2.16 inhabitants per dwelling, better than in most EU countries. also, what BBC is hiding is that 90% of the homes are paid for. In Sweden there are 4 924 792 dwellings for a population of 10.12 million or 2.053 inhabitants per dwelling. However the percentage of detached houses in Germany, Sweden is significantly less than in Romania,. Only Croatia and Hungary have a higher percentage of detached houses than Romania. So the overcrowding exists only in fake news .https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=File:Fig18_1.png
The problem with house ownership if the West is the real estate price and the lack of government support.